By now I’m sure everyone has heard of the notorious hat
incident that occurred on the Mount Royal Campus a few days ago. If you
haven’t, it basically went like this: a student (Matt) wearing a “Make America
Great Again” hat around campus was confronted by another student (Zoe) for
promoting “hate speech.” The two got into a conflict, the argument escalated,
and someone placed a video of the incident on Facebook to go viral.
From there, it spiralled rapidly out of control, with
coverage on a local, national, and international level. The scale of the conflict
has escalated exponentially with the video going viral and anger being stirred
up on both sides. The relatively innocuous incident has resulted in bad blood
and vicious attacks on both sides. Zoe, in particular, has received a lot of backlash
(up to the point of violent threats) for an action she was arguably justified
in taking.
The issue being pedalled by the media is the debate about
free speech this video prompts. In a supposedly safe space like a university
campus, can the slogan of a racist political candidate be called “hate speech?”
I’m not going to get bogged down in that argument, as I know smarter people
than me are already doing that.
What strikes me as the biggest issue is the polarized
reactions to the video. People don’t seem to be considering why each person
acted as they did, only how they did it. Little of the media coverage considers
the individuals in question beyond the small scope of the video posted.
Zoe’s argument rested on the fact that the hat’s slogan supports
the campaign of a sexist, sociopathic narcissist who regularly stokes the fires
of racial tension while obliviously inciting violence. Her motivation came from
the desire to ensure that the campus is a place in which everyone can feel safe
and secure. She was standing up for those who might justifiably feel
uncomfortable at the sight of a politician like Trump being promoted.
Zoe’s actions were largely selfless, which is something few
people seem to be considering. The creation of safe spaces is an incredibly
important endeavour, and all individuals should feel free to express themselves
in whatever manner they wish. She is now facing continual backlash for attempting
to support this ideal.
But don’t Trump supporters get the same privilege, many
would argue?
I don’t know Matt personally, but we are in the same program
and have shared some classes. Having seen him both with and without the hat, before
and after the incident, I can’t say I have ever seen any indication of
prejudices along the lines that Trump espouses. My understanding is that Matt
supports Mr. Trump’s economic policies rather than his social ones.
This raises the question: when a politician so actively
promotes the marginalization of specific religious and ethnic groups, is it
possible to promote that politician without promoting those prejudices?
As this incident illustrates, there are no clear answers.
Because of this, it is all the more important that level
heads prevail. People need to think rationally about the incident and try to
understand the motivations of both sides: one was standing up for marginalized
minorities while the other was idly promoting a candidate with specific
policies he supports. Neither of them did anything terribly wrong. Zoe’s
confrontational method was not the correct way of addressing the issue, yet the
concerns themselves were completely valid. Likewise, it is completely fair for
Matt to promote a political candidate he supports, but it was unreasonable of
him not to expect some kind of backlash.
These “mistakes” do not define either of these individuals.
Once the media picked up on the story, anger spread like
wildfire, with Zoe generally portrayed as the villain. To me, this is a big
problem.
While the media is happy to highlight Zoe’s insistence that
Matt remove his hat, there seems to be little mention of her background as a
leading member of the Students’ Association of Mount Royal University (SAMRU).
As a member of SAMRU, it is her job to act as a leader among students and
protect the interests of everyone on campus. Naturally, it would be fair for
her to take the responsibility of standing up for those who have an issue with
the hat in question.
Whether or not the slogan counts as hate speech, people feel uncomfortable at the presence of Matt’s
hat. Given Trump’s background, this seems reasonable. Did Zoe go about the
right way in bringing up these concerns? No. Was she justified in attempting to
address them? Absolutely.
Zoe’s actions came from a good place. Her role as student leader
makes her the natural voice for expressing concerns. The fact that she has been
continually vilified for doing this is pathetic and ignorant. Zoe is not the
villain here any more than Matt is for wearing his hat. Remember Zoe’s
background and motivation the next time the media labels her a “bully”,
accuses her of “attacking”
anyone, or mocks her for being “frightened.”
If you find yourself agreeing with these terms, you are part
of the problem.
Consider the fact that without online exposure the incident
would have received little to no attention. If any blame is to be placed, it
should be placed upon the idiot who decided to post a video of the conflict
online. In the digital age such hot topic videos are not ignored, and the
cameraman was incredibly irresponsible (if not plain stupid) to think it would go
unnoticed. Indeed, the fact that he posted the video on a community page as
well as his personal one suggests he was specifically going out of his way to
defame Zoe.
Even so, sharing the video could easily have been a simple
lapse in judgement. My point is that the amount of controversy this video has
caused is unnecessary, and the amount of anger it has stirred up is neither fair
nor warranted. Nobody involved should be attacked so viciously for their
actions. Relatively minor mistakes have been blown out of proportion, and it sickens
me to see the sort of threats and attacks Zoe has received in the wake of this
video.
I don’t know Zoe, but I wish I did. I can’t imagine what she’s
going through right now. Whatever her actions and whatever opinion people may
have about those actions, there is no excuse for the derogatory, threatening,
and sexist response the video has received.
I hope Zoe understands that for every asshole on the
internet hailing abuse, there are a dozen people who understand that her
actions came from the best of places. The world needs more people like her who
are willing to stand up for the rights of others.
