I recently watched Noam Chomsky’s Requiem for the American Dream. In true Chomsky fashion, the film
dismantles the mechanisms of our capitalist society, illustrating clearly
exactly how the current economic system serves to keep the rich rich and the
poor poor. Some of the ideas in the film are typical Chomsky, but in a world
where inequality is a political buzzword, the film could not be any timelier.
For those who aren’t familiar with his work, Noam Chomsky is
often regarded as one of the greatest intellectuals of our time. Originally a
linguist, he has written over a hundred books in a broad range of fields
including history, politics, and philosophy. Chomsky’s views are not for
everyone (he is very much a socialist and an anarchist), but even his critics
cannot argue against the fact that he is one of the greatest minds of the
twentieth century.
In Requiem for the
American Dream, Chomsky illustrates the “10 Principles of Concentration of
Wealth and Power,” including rules like “Run the Regulators,” “Attack
Solidarity,” and “Manufacture Consent.” It is through these methods, Chomsky
argues, that America’s so called “one percenters” maintain their own exclusive
place among the economic stratosphere. By running the government and
manipulating the masses, big business continually marginalizes the working
class. Chomsky illustrates here why the American Dream is truly just that: a
dream.
The timing of this film is especially fitting, given the
current state of American economics and politics. Inequality is at an all-time high,
with even the IMF
admitting the failure of neoliberalism, breeding a political climate in which
candidates like Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump can ride the wave of
frustration on both ends of the political spectrum. The increasing polarization
of politics is not limited to the United States (as we can see from events like
Brexit, or the increasing popularity of nationalist parties); however, as the
capitalist standard bearer and the cultural heart of the western world, this
phenomenon is, unsurprisingly, most visible in America.
With all this in mind, Chomsky’s diagnosis seems all the
more poignant. For those acquainted with Chomsky’s work (a claim that I can
only partially make), the film will seem familiar. It’s the classic critique of
capitalism laid out in fairly simplistic terms.
It’s this simplicity that makes the film so effective. If
one wants an in depth analysis of the problems with capitalism, one reads in-depth
works of economic and political theory by Chomsky and others. A seventy minute
documentary makes the arguments appealing to a lay audience for whom it is not
necessary to understand the intricacies of microeconomics. Indeed, I’d count
myself closer to this audience.
The filmmakers do an excellent job of accompanying Chomsky’s
analysis with effective and poignant imagery. Chomsky’s words are interspersed
with shots of Wall Street juxtaposed against images of the homeless and
countless other representations of economic inequality.
One scene in particular stuck with me long after the film
ended. When discussing the principle of “Manufacturing Consent,” Chomsky highlights
the engineering of society to prioritize material wealth so as to discourage
meaningful thought. Accompanying this analysis, we see a shot of perhaps the
most appropriate symbol of consumerism, Walmart, overplayed by the words: “A
group of teenagers with a free afternoon will go to the shopping mall rather
than the library.”
I found this point in the film particularly haunting. By looking
around on any given day, one can see the prominence of rampant consumerism. As
a society, we, in general, have prioritized frivolous materialism above all
else.
As an example, just look at the recent prominence of Pokémon Go. Sure, many of today’s youth
are getting outdoors more than ever before. But what is the point of going
outside if we never look up from our phones? A plugged in population is far
more likely to consent. By focussing on such, ultimately, trivial things (video
games, the newest smartphone, or other material possessions), our attention is
taken away from meaningful causes. Consumerism, as Chomsky puts it, has become
the measure of a good life.
Requiem for the
American Dream is filled with such poignant moments, and I hope it will
encourage some people to reflect on their lives and their role in society. I don’t
hold myself above anyone – I realize I am just as complicit in the system as
all those around me. However, I believe it is important for people to think
critically and consider their own role in society, something I continually
attempt to do.
The film isn’t perfect. It isn’t ground breaking by any
means. It relies highly on rhetoric, and recycles some old criticisms of
capitalism. But it is this simplicity that makes it accessible for the average
viewer. I would highly recommend that everyone go watch it. The film is only seventy
minutes long and available on Netflix, so put it on in the background while you’re
doing homework or chores. You never know. It might change your perspective a
little.
7/10
No comments:
Post a Comment